Ford Fallacies
While this doesn't describe stories directly from the school or the classroom, the topic couldn't be more relevant to the classroom and what happens there each day. The topic is teacher "unions." First, I put "unions" in quotes because teacher associations are not traditional unions. Certainly, they have important aspects of unionization, such as negotiating contracts and advocating for members rights. But I've never heard the American Medical Association called the doctors' "union."
On my way to school the other day, I first heard a commentator on radio linking teacher associations to traditional unions. In fact, those who oppose the voice of teachers in public education have a difficult time even writing the word "association." It is always the "teachers' union." Then, on another station, I listened to a rant about the announced layoffs (30,000) at Ford and how the unions had ruined the company. First, the speaker mentioned that workers at Ford were making 64 dollars an hour. Perhaps some are--after forty years of work. But, even so, not all workers make that, or even the average wage at a company. Interesting though how we so rarely hear about the "outrageous" salary of managers, CEOs and their stock options. Didn't those people in those positions have actually more influence on the company's health and direction than any 64 dollar an hour worker?
The kicker though was that it all came down to the union's fault that 30,000 Ford workers were headed toward layoff. I just don't see how it was the union that made decisions about what automobiles to manufacture and how to price them. In fact, it is closer to the truth that Ford was simply building gas-guzzling behemoths that fewer and fewer people wanted to buy. Those were not union decisions.
A similar campaign is in operation against teachers and the teacher "unions." Unions seem to be at fault for the poor performance of many of our public schools. Tenure, they say. Can't fire poor teachers, they say. But, those things are simply not true. Nevermind that decisions like the resources committed to "No Child Left Behind," standardized testing, and the gap of achievement between ethnic and cultural groups are no doing of the Associations. The fact is that an increasing amount of what the education establishment says that parents and students want are as outdated as the Ford gas-guzzling behemoths. The teacher associations are actively engaged in trying to overcome the inertia of a system that doesn't know what it means to be an educated person, only that it has something to do with getting good test scores.
On my way to school the other day, I first heard a commentator on radio linking teacher associations to traditional unions. In fact, those who oppose the voice of teachers in public education have a difficult time even writing the word "association." It is always the "teachers' union." Then, on another station, I listened to a rant about the announced layoffs (30,000) at Ford and how the unions had ruined the company. First, the speaker mentioned that workers at Ford were making 64 dollars an hour. Perhaps some are--after forty years of work. But, even so, not all workers make that, or even the average wage at a company. Interesting though how we so rarely hear about the "outrageous" salary of managers, CEOs and their stock options. Didn't those people in those positions have actually more influence on the company's health and direction than any 64 dollar an hour worker?
The kicker though was that it all came down to the union's fault that 30,000 Ford workers were headed toward layoff. I just don't see how it was the union that made decisions about what automobiles to manufacture and how to price them. In fact, it is closer to the truth that Ford was simply building gas-guzzling behemoths that fewer and fewer people wanted to buy. Those were not union decisions.
A similar campaign is in operation against teachers and the teacher "unions." Unions seem to be at fault for the poor performance of many of our public schools. Tenure, they say. Can't fire poor teachers, they say. But, those things are simply not true. Nevermind that decisions like the resources committed to "No Child Left Behind," standardized testing, and the gap of achievement between ethnic and cultural groups are no doing of the Associations. The fact is that an increasing amount of what the education establishment says that parents and students want are as outdated as the Ford gas-guzzling behemoths. The teacher associations are actively engaged in trying to overcome the inertia of a system that doesn't know what it means to be an educated person, only that it has something to do with getting good test scores.

